12.03 pm, Sunday November 22 2009

Rudd slams art depicting naked children

13:47 AEST Sun Jul 6 2008
VIEWS: 0
| FLOCKS: 0
| comments0 comments so far

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says he can't stand artwork that depicts naked children.

Mr Rudd on Sunday said work such as that shown in this month's edition of Art Monthly Australia did the opposite of restoring dignity to the debate over depictions of children in art.

The taxpayer-funded magazine used a picture of a naked six-year-old girl on the cover of its July edition in protest against the treatment of artist Bill Henson.

Angered by the "hysteria" over Henson's pictures of a 13-year-old girl, the magazine also has a number of highly sexualised images inside, according to the Sunday Telegraph newspaper.

Art Monthly editor Maurice O'Riordan said he hoped the July edition would restore some "dignity to the debate".

Mr Rudd was asked if the picture restored dignity.

"If you ask for my personal view, no it doesn't. It does the reverse," he told ABC television.

"My view hasn't changed on this. We're talking about the innocence of little children here.

"A little child cannot answer for themselves about whether they wish to be depicted in this way.

"I have very deep, strong, personal views on this, which is that we should be on about maximising the protection of children.

"I don't think this is a step in the right direction at all."

Mr Rudd said he had no idea what the motivation for the Art Monthly pictures was.

"But I've got to say my interest and the interest of many Australians, I think most Australians, is to protect little children and restore some innocence to childhood," he said.

"Frankly, I can't stand this stuff."

Child protection campaigner Hetty Johnston hopes community outrage over the picture will lead to laws banning such photos.

Bravehearts executive director Mrs Johnston branded it "sexual exploitation of children".

"I don't know if they are trying to get some notoriety on the back of Bill Henson but it is irresponsible," Mrs Johnston said.

"It is not the normal state of affairs. Yes it is natural and beautiful (a naked child) but it is also private.

"This child is six and cannot possibly give consent but this photo is taken at the whims and benefits of adults.

"Children won't be buying it. Adults will. It's not in the best interest of children."

Mrs Johnston is heartened by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's opposition to the photo and said his response and community outrage would help her push for laws banning such photos.

She said the prime minister has made his view "very, very clear" and she had never felt more confident of the direction Australia was taking on child protection, during her 11 years of campaigning.

Deputy Opposition Leader Julie Bishop is concerned a child has been exploited to make a political point.

"I support artistic freedom, freedom of expression, but I am concerned if there's exploitation of children," the Opposition's workplace spokeswoman told Sky News.

"Unfortunately, this sounds as if a child has been exploited for the purposes of making a political point.

"There are other ways of making a point in support of freedom of expression and artistic expression particularly."

 
SHARE:
MESSENGER
FACEBOOK
MORE
Blog on Spaces
Add to delicious
Add to Digg
Share on MySpace
?
Share, bookmark, and save your favourite ninemsn articles and features.  Learn more.
User comments
Have we totaly lost our sense of right and wrong? It is wrong to portray children in the nude and try and justify it by saying it is art. Adults who do this are promoting child porn under the art banner and are sick. Our courts deal with this daily and the community abhore the abuse of children in this way, what gives the art community the right to allow these images to be shown and nothing happens to them. They fall in the same category as pedophiles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If Kevin Rudd finds this so disgusting, will he petition the Vatican to have the Sistine Chapel whitewashed over? After all it is covered with pictures of naked children meeting all the criteria of 'pornography' - genitals exposed, sexually provocative poses etc. Furthermore Michelangelo was a notorious pederast (as were most men in his class of society at the time). Yet we flock to admire the great work of art they represent without comment or judgement other than 'beautiful'!. I found the picture on the art magazine to be beautiful and innocent, not at all sexualised or pornographic. However, one must acknowledge that like beauty, pornography is in the eye of the beholder and such art is not acceptable or appropriate in modern society, even where no pornographic purpose was intended.
You can't take your own child's photo on some beachs or public pools. The perversion is in the ADULT's eye NOT the childs. The child would have to consent to being naked. No kid is going to get naked and pose unless he or she consents. This pose is, to me, not a sexual pose. As far as I can see with the black box, the child is covering herself. It is not something I would buy or go to see, but sometimes 'do gooders' go too far in their urge to protect. If the Police hadn't acted over Henson, then this magazine would not have done this issue. Has anyone asked the children involved is either case THEIR opinion?
right first things first, art is art, porn is porn. if a person can not distingush between the two, they are sick in the head
i think that the people who took the picture see this as art. but putting it on the front cover of a magazine for anyone to see is NOT a smart move. it's basically just a magazine for pedifiles.
As part of a blended family we have 8 children and yes, we have photos of our children in the bath and in various states of dress in our photo albums and on discs. What puts the right emotional and moral context on these photos are the expressions on our children's faces innocent, childlike, laughing, smiling and having fun! NOT the monumental rubbish on this magazine cover that aims to place an adult frame around a child's soul disrobing that child of its innocence through imagary thinly veiled as esoteric art. I understood photography in artform was meant to capture the true soul of a person -"the camera never lies". However this appears not to apply to the photographer. The magazine image above manufactures the child's expression to that of an adult. Ask your child to pose for the camera and see the expressions they convey and you will see the difference. Pull their funding and sack these idiots please.
You're an idiot... the heat must have fried your brains!
It's not about the innocent opinion of decent people, but about how some seriously disturbed person will buy this mag, and indulge themselves sexually. That is what we are trying to protect our children from. We are feeding their sexual fettishes, which will lead to some poor child being molested. It is our job as a society to protect all children, and to speak for all who have no voice. I'm sick to death of the ugliness that is published in the name of 'art'. YUCK!!!
I fail to see how photos of a naked little child in a public periodical, Art Monthly, qualify as art, and not porn. This model was way to young to give legal consent. This type of sexualization of children is wrong, and provides fodder for paedophiles. What is astonishing is that this garbage that dares call itself an art magazine is paid for by our taxes! It is time Kevin 07 cancelled all these taxpayer funded donations to these people who have the gall to call themselves artists!
these poor kids they dont even know how to read yet!! let alone sit for some sleezy photographer "artist" who claims this is beauty!!!! do these kids have a opinion?? or were they brain washed into thinking this is the norm?! any pearent who would allow these photos to be taken of there own children need psycological assesments done and should be charged to knowledge of the fact for child pornography !!! they allowed this creep to photo them its their fault as much as it is his!! isnt it funny the lengths people will go to just to have their kids faces in the public eye!!!! PATHETIC!!!

Most popular

 Demi furious at Photoshop claimsDemi Moore has reacted with fury at allegations her body was badly 'enhanced' by a fashion magazine.
 One dead as Miley Cyrus tour bus crashesThe driver of a Miley Cyrus tour bus has died and one passenger has been injured after the vehicle veered off the road and flipped over in Virginia.
 Barmaid claims she had sex with SA premierA former parliament house barmaid has come forward claiming she had a sexual relationship with South Australian Premier Mike Rann.
 Twins' birth mum wants daughters to stayThe birth mother of twins Krishna and Trishna who gave them up due to poverty says she wants them to remain in Australia to be educated.
 Spears' ex-boyfriend sentenced to jailBritney Spears' ex-boyfriend Adnan Ghalib is being sent to jail for 45 days for leaving the scene of an accident.
 Departing Oprah problem for TV stationsOprah Winfrey will leave a huge void for broadcast TV in 2011, even as she raises the possibility of more Oprah than ever when she starts her own cable network.
 Kim Watkins' future at Ten uncertainThe future career of morning television host Kim Watkins is uncertain, with Network Ten unable to say if she'll return in 2010.
 Norfolk pilot 'flew without enough fuel'The pilot hailed a hero for ditching his plane safely off Norfolk Island this week may have been dangerously negligent after reportedly making the journey without enough fuel.
 Judge dismisses Cyrus 'slant eyes' suitA US judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Miley Cyrus which accused her of discriminating against Asians after she was photographed making "slant eyes".
 British poll reveals sexual ignoranceMore than one in 10 British people don't realise that a woman can still get pregnant if she has sex standing up, according to a poll on Friday.
Amanda Knox at her trial. (AAP)'Harboured hate'Prosecutor sums up murder case against student Amanda Knox. In for the long haul... don't forget activity bag! (Getty Images)Trouble-free tripsTRAVEL: How to plan a family adventure without the pain. A happy fan gets his copy of Modern Warfare. (AAP)Bloody bonanzaModern Warfare 2 rakes in over $500 million in its first week. AAPBad energyIs there a connection between mobile phones and cancer? ACAChurch slammedAussie senator brands Scientology a 'criminal organisation'. Schoolies celebrations on the Gold Coast. (AAP)Schoolies swipeCalls for drinking age to be lifted to 19 ahead of annual teen party.
advertisement
Entourage death Miley Cyrus's driver killed, another injured after tour bus overturns ... read more Running on empty Cleo bachelor pilot reportedly made journey without enough fuel ... read more 'Worst Photoshop ever' Demi Moore's hip deformed in Photoshop disaster ... read more Sickest stunt Furious hackers track down man who hurled dog off bridge and posted video online ... read more Stuck in chair for eight months 365kg man dies after being stuck in a recliner chair for months ... read more Hair dye horror Teenage girl's face 'turns into an alien' after a botched hair dye job ... read more Become a Nine News breaker Seen or heard something? Send tip-offs, images and video from your mobile or PC ... contact us
Monster smashTwilight sequel breaks opening day box-office record as hype rolls on
You need the latest version of Flash Player.
Enjoy the most vivid content on the web
Watch video without extra features
Interact with applications on your favourite sites
Upgrade now

page complete
Other ninemsn businesses: iSelect RateCity
© 1997-2009 ninemsn Pty Ltd - All rights reserved